Frequently Asked Questions

Ridgeback’s methods are considered deterministic because they rely on specific real-time activity to identify and respond to potential threats. This means that the software will consistently follow the same process and produce the same outcome for the same input or trigger, allowing for more predictable and reliable threat detection and response. Additionally, Ridgeback uses deterministic methods to identify and respond to lateral movement, which is often a critical component of advanced persistent threats. By having a deterministic approach to identifying and responding to lateral movement, Ridgeback can help prevent the spread of an attack throughout a network and minimize damage.

Here are some potential Ridgeback use-cases that customers may find compelling and valuable within their budgets:

1. Detecting and Disrupting Cyber Attacks: Ridgeback’s ability to automatically engage with adversaries inside the network during hacking operations and deterministically detect, disrupt, and deter aoottacks can help customers protect their critical assets from cyber threats.

2. Network Visibility and Situational Awareness: Ridgeback’s network traffic analysis capabilities can help customers gain real-time visibility into their network activity, identify potential threats, and respond to incidents before they escalate.

3. Vulnerability Assessment and Management: Ridgeback’s additional capabilities for vulnerability assessment can help customers identify and prioritize security vulnerabilities, and take proactive steps to remediate them before they can be exploited by attackers.

4. Compliance and Policy Enforcement: Ridgeback’s ability to enforce acceptable-use policies can help customers ensure that their employees and users are complying with relevant regulations and policies, reducing the risk of non-compliance fines and other penalties.

5. Incident Response and Forensics: Ridgeback’s ability to deterministically detect and disrupt attacks can help customers quickly respond to security incidents, contain their scope, and conduct forensic investigations to identify the root cause of the attack and prevent future incidents.

It’s important to note that the specific use-cases that customers may find compelling and valuable will depend on their unique security needs, budget, and other factors. As such, it’s important to tailor Ridgeback’s capabilities to meet the specific needs of each customer, and demonstrate how the product can provide tangible value and ROI within their budget constraints.

Ridgeback can help with disaster recovery by providing real-time visibility and detection of cyber threats, which can help organizations quickly identify and respond to security incidents. In the event of a disaster, such as a ransomware attack or data breach, Ridgeback’s capabilities can help organizations quickly detect and disrupt the attack, reducing the scope of the incident and minimizing damage to critical systems and data.

Ridgeback’s deterministic detection and disruption capabilities enable it to automatically engage with adversaries inside the network during hacking operations, allowing organizations to quickly identify and contain cyber attacks before they can spread and cause additional damage. Ridgeback’s ability to deterministically detect and disrupt attacks also helps organizations reduce the risk of false positives, which can lead to wasted resources and false alarms during incident response.

Furthermore, Ridgeback’s additional capabilities for network traffic analysis, vulnerability assessment, and network hygiene monitoring can help organizations identify and address security risks before they can be exploited by attackers, reducing the likelihood of a successful cyber attack and improving overall resilience.

In summary, Ridgeback can help with disaster recovery by providing real-time visibility and detection of cyber threats, enabling quick and effective incident response, and reducing the risk of successful attacks by identifying and addressing security risks before they can be exploited.

Ridgeback and IDPS (Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems) solutions have some similarities in terms of their capabilities, but they also have significant differences.

IDPS solutions are designed to monitor network traffic and identify potential security threats based on predefined rules and signatures. When a potential threat is detected, IDPS solutions can take action to block or prevent the attack from succeeding. IDPS solutions typically rely on rules and signatures to identify known threats, and they may not be effective against unknown or emerging threats.

On the other hand, Ridgeback is a deterministic detection and disruption solution that automatically engages with attackers inside the network during hacking operations. Ridgeback does not rely on rules or signatures to detect threats; instead, it uses a deterministic approach that analyzes network traffic to identify attacker behaviors and patterns, and then engages with the attacker to disrupt their activity. Ridgeback’s approach is more effective against unknown or emerging threats, as it can detect and disrupt attacks that do not match predefined rules or signatures.

Another key difference is that Ridgeback can also deliver a host of additional capabilities for security and IT management, such as vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement. These additional capabilities are not typically available with IDPS solutions, which are primarily focused on detecting and preventing attacks.

Overall, while IDPS solutions and Ridgeback have some similarities, Ridgeback’s deterministic detection and disruption approach and additional capabilities for security and IT management set it apart from traditional IDPS solutions.

1. Comprehensive data collection: While comprehensive data collection is important, it can also result in an overwhelming amount of data, which can make it difficult for security teams to identify and respond to actual threats. Additionally, XDR solutions often lack the ability to collect data from non-standard or legacy systems, which can leave blind spots in an organization’s security posture.

2. Automated correlation and analysis: While automation can help reduce the time and resources required to investigate and respond to security incidents, it can also result in false positives and false negatives. This can lead to security teams spending valuable time chasing false alarms or missing actual threats.

3. Contextualized alerts: While contextualized alerts can help prioritize responses, XDR solutions often lack the ability to provide detailed context around alerts, such as the specific attack technique or malware used. This can result in security teams having to spend additional time researching and analyzing the alert before responding.

4. Threat hunting capabilities: While proactive threat hunting is important, XDR solutions often lack the ability to provide detailed guidance or support for threat hunting activities. This can leave security teams unsure of what to look for or how to effectively hunt for threats.

5. Integration with existing security tools: While integration with existing security tools is important, XDR solutions often lack the ability to effectively integrate with legacy or non-standard systems. This can result in blind spots in an organization’s security posture.

6.Scalability and flexibility: While scalability and flexibility are important, XDR solutions often lack the ability to effectively scale or adapt to changes in an organization’s infrastructure or threat landscape. This can result in security teams having to spend additional time and resources managing and maintaining the solution.

7.Simplified management and reporting: While a centralized management console and comprehensive reporting capabilities are important, XDR solutions often lack the ability to effectively provide meaningful reports or insights. This can result in security teams spending valuable time trying to make sense of the data, rather than taking action to improve security posture.

In summary, while the characteristics listed above are important, it is critical that XDR solutions provide more effective and efficient capabilities to address the complex security challenges faced by organizations today. XDR solutions should provide a balance of automation and human expertise, while also providing detailed context and guidance to help security teams effectively identify and respond to threats. Additionally, XDR solutions should be designed with legacy and non-standard systems in mind and provide meaningful insights and reporting to enable security teams to continuously improve their security posture.

• Vulnerability assessment products are designed to scan networks, systems, and applications for known vulnerabilities and provide a report of the findings, while Ridgeback uses a deterministic approach to identify and disrupt attacks in real-time.
• Vulnerability assessment products are typically passive and do not actively engage with attackers, while Ridgeback can automatically engage with attackers inside the network during hacking operations.
• Vulnerability assessment products may not be effective against unknown or emerging threats, while Ridgeback’s approach can detect and disrupt attacks that do not match predefined rules or signatures.
• Ridgeback delivers a host of additional capabilities for security and IT management, such as situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement, which are not typically available with vulnerability assessment products.
• Vulnerability assessment products are primarily focused on identifying and prioritizing vulnerabilities for remediation, while Ridgeback is a comprehensive solution for detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks, as well as providing additional capabilities for security and IT management.

Overall, while vulnerability assessment products and Ridgeback have some similarities in terms of their focus on identifying security weaknesses, Ridgeback’s deterministic detection and disruption approach, ability to engage with attackers, and additional capabilities for security and IT management set it apart from traditional vulnerability assessment products.

– A CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) would likely purchase Ridgeback because it provides a range of features and benefits that are important to maintaining a strong cybersecurity posture. Some of the key reasons a CISO may choose Ridgeback include:

1. Real-time awareness of communication: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility of all network activity, including details about IPs, OUIs, MACs, Ports, Services, and patterns of communication across geographies. This can help identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.

2. Active disruption of hacking operations: Ridgeback engages attackers during their reconnaissance and exploitation activities inside the network, disrupting their operations and preventing them from discovering what is and isn’t on the network.

3. Lightweight and invisible to normal network operations: Ridgeback requires only a single 1MB core installation per network segment and is extremely lightweight and invisible to normal network operations, minimizing any impact on productivity.

4. Rich policy engine: Ridgeback’s policy engine allows for various applications, such as attack disruption and deterrence, micro-segmentation, network access control, network hygiene, system monitoring, endpoint visibility, and red team operations.

5. Real-time threat detection: Ridgeback provides real-time details of threats with and without payloads, open ports, LLMNR traffic, missing assets, unauthorized scans, device discovery, and more.

6. Scalable deployment: Ridgeback can be deployed on a laptop or across global network segments, and it can be managed from a central on-premise or cloud-based server.

Overall, Ridgeback’s comprehensive and proactive approach to cybersecurity, combined with its ease of deployment and management, make it an attractive option for CISOs looking to enhance their organization’s cybersecurity defenses.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) services can provide significant benefits to organizations by providing a dedicated team of cybersecurity professionals to monitor, detect, and respond to cyber threats. However, there are also some weaknesses to consider when using MDR services. Some of these weaknesses include:

1.Cost: MDR services can be expensive, and the cost can vary depending on the size of the organization, the level of service required, and other factors. This can be a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

2.False positives: MDR services can generate a large number of alerts, and many of these alerts may turn out to be false positives, which can be time-consuming for the organization’s IT team to investigate.

3.Response time: MDR services may not always provide real-time monitoring, and response times may vary depending on the level of service and the complexity of the threat.

4.Dependency on service provider: Organizations that rely on MDR services may become overly dependent on their service provider and may not have the internal resources and expertise to handle cybersecurity incidents on their own.

5.Limited visibility: MDR services may not provide complete visibility into all aspects of an organization’s network and systems, which can make it more difficult to detect and respond to certain types of threats.

6.Compliance concerns: Some organizations may have concerns about using MDR services from third-party providers due to compliance requirements, data privacy concerns, or other regulatory issues.

Overall, while Managed Detection and Response services can provide significant benefits, organizations should carefully consider these potential weaknesses when deciding whether to use these services and selecting a service provider. It is important to choose a provider that meets the organization’s specific needs and can provide a high level of service and support.

According to various reports and studies, a significant proportion of cyber intrusions use offensive techniques associated with lateral movement. For example, the 2020 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report found that lateral movement was involved in 54% of breaches analyzed. Similarly, the 2020 SANS Institute Incident Response Survey found that lateral movement was involved in 62% of incidents reported by survey respondents. Therefore, it can be concluded that lateral movement is a common tactic used by cyber intruders in a majority of incidents.

Some of these include:

1. Weak passwords: Using weak, easily guessable passwords can allow attackers to gain access to a device and potentially the entire network.

2. Unpatched systems: Failure to regularly apply security patches and updates to devices can leave them vulnerable to known exploits.

3. Default configurations: Many devices are shipped with default configurations that may be insecure or easily exploitable. Failing to change these configurations can leave devices vulnerable to attack.

4. Unnecessary services: Running unnecessary or unused services on a device can create additional attack surface and increase the risk of compromise.

5. Misconfigured firewalls: Misconfigured firewalls can allow unauthorized traffic to pass through and compromise devices on the network.

6. Open ports: Leaving unnecessary ports open on devices can create additional attack surface and increase the risk of compromise.

7. Insecure protocols: Using insecure protocols, such as FTP or Telnet, can allow attackers to eavesdrop on or manipulate network traffic.

8. Lack of encryption: Failing to encrypt sensitive data in transit or at rest can leave it vulnerable to interception or theft.

It is important for organizations to regularly assess their network and devices for these and other misconfigurations, and take steps to address any vulnerabilities that are identified.

There is a correlation between cybersecurity compliance regimes and security outcomes, but it is not necessarily a direct or strong one. Compliance with regulations and standards such as HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and ISO 27001 can provide a baseline level of security controls and processes that can help mitigate some risks. However, achieving compliance does not guarantee protection against all cyber threats and does not necessarily ensure that an organization has implemented best practices or the most effective security measures for their specific threat landscape.

Additionally, some organizations may focus solely on compliance and neglect to address emerging threats or implement additional security measures beyond what is required for compliance. Conversely, organizations that prioritize security and implement best practices may exceed compliance requirements.

In summary, cybersecurity compliance regimes can provide a foundation for security, but they are not a guarantee of strong security outcomes. It is important for organizations to prioritize both compliance and proactive security measures tailored to their specific threat landscape.

While cybersecurity deception solutions are gaining popularity among organizations as a way to enhance their security posture, they are not without their critiques. Some of the principle critiques of cybersecurity deception solutions include:

False positives: Deception solutions rely on creating fake assets and data to deceive attackers, but this can sometimes generate false positives, where legitimate users or processes trigger alerts and security teams waste time investigating benign activity.

Complexity: Implementing and managing deception solutions can be complex and time-consuming, particularly in large and complex environments. This can lead to high costs and require dedicated staff to manage the system.

Limited effectiveness: Some critics argue that deception solutions are not effective in deterring advanced persistent threats (APTs) and sophisticated attackers who can quickly identify and avoid the decoys.

Maintenance: Deception solutions require regular maintenance and updating to ensure that the decoys remain convincing and effective. This can be challenging for organizations with limited resources or expertise.

• Deception solutions may not be effective against skilled or determined attackers, while Ridgeback’s approach is more effective against these types of attackers.
• Ridgeback can automatically engage with attackers inside the network during hacking operations, while deception solutions rely on the attacker’s curiosity and actions to trigger alerts.
• Ridgeback delivers a host of additional capabilities for security and IT management, such as vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement.
• Deception solutions are primarily focused on detecting and responding to attacks, while Ridgeback is a comprehensive solution for detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks, as well as providing additional capabilities for security and IT management.

Ridgeback:

Provides real-time comprehensive awareness of communication on the network

Exposes key issues in network hygiene that are productivity concerns and security vulnerabilities

Prevents attackers from discovering what is and isn’t on the network

Actively disrupts hacking operations by engaging attackers during their reconnaissance and exploitation activities inside the network

Implements man-in-the-middle techniques automatically, at scale, to disrupt the adversary without imposing any effect on authorized users and network activity

Rich policy engine allows for various applications, such as micro-segmentation, network access control, system monitoring, endpoint visibility, and red team operations

Requires only a single 1MB core installation per network segment, and it is extremely lightweight and invisible to normal network operations

Provides a real-time picture of the network map, including details about IPs, OUIs, MACs, Ports, Services, and patterns of Communication across geographies

Applicable to small, mid-sized, and large organizations

XDR:

Provides extended detection and response capabilities across different security domains (e.g. endpoint, network, cloud)

Uses advanced analytics and machine learning to detect and respond to threats in real-time

Collects and correlates data from various security sources to provide a holistic view of security incidents and threat landscape

Automates incident response and threat hunting activities to reduce response time and improve efficiency

Supports integration with other security tools and platforms to enhance overall security posture

Provides centralized management and visibility of security operations

Typically used by mid-sized and large organizations with complex security requirements.

Real-time awareness and threat visibility: Ridgeback provides real-time and comprehensive awareness of communication and exposes key issues in network hygiene that are productivity concerns and security vulnerabilities. This visibility can supplement SOC operations by providing them with additional context and insights into the network’s activities and potential threats.

Automated attack disruption and deterrence: Ridgeback can disrupt attacks and deter adversaries by automatically implementing man-in-the-middle techniques at scale without imposing any effect on authorized users and network activity. This capability can complement SOC operations by reducing the burden on human analysts and allowing them to focus on more complex threats.

Micro-segmentation and network access control: Ridgeback’s policy engine allows for micro-segmentation and network access control, enabling organizations to segment their networks and control access based on policies. This capability can supplement SOC operations by reducing the attack surface and providing additional protection against lateral movement.

Endpoint visibility and system monitoring: Ridgeback provides endpoint visibility and system monitoring, enabling organizations to monitor and track endpoint activity and detect potential threats. This capability can complement SOC operations by providing them with additional insights into endpoint behavior and potential threats.

Red team operations: Ridgeback can also be used for red team operations, allowing organizations to simulate attacks and test their defenses. This capability can supplement SOC operations by providing them with additional insights into their defenses and identifying potential weaknesses that can be addressed.

Overall, Ridgeback can supplement and complement SOC operations by providing additional visibility, automation, and capabilities that can enhance an organization’s cyber defense posture.

.

Real-time network situational awareness is generally considered to be an important aspect of effective cybersecurity, and many CISOs prioritize it as a key area for improvement. In a survey conducted by Ponemon Institute in 2020, 73% of respondents stated that real-time monitoring and detection of cyber threats was a high or very high priority for their organization. Additionally, in a 2021 survey by Cybersecurity Insiders, 60% of respondents reported that their organization had increased investment in real-time network situational awareness tools and technologies in the past year.

That being said, it is important to note that simply having real-time network situational awareness tools in place is not sufficient for effective cybersecurity. It is also important to have skilled personnel who can interpret and act upon the information provided by these tools. In the same Ponemon Institute survey mentioned above, 80% of respondents stated that their organization had a shortage of cybersecurity staff, and 59% reported that their organization lacked adequate expertise in threat hunting and investigations. Therefore, while real-time network situational awareness is important, it is only one piece of the larger cybersecurity puzzle.

Growing number of cyber threats: With the increasing number of cybercriminals and their tactics becoming more sophisticated, the volume of cyber threats is also growing. This has led to a significant increase in the number of incidents that organizations need to manage and respond to.

Proliferation of endpoints: The growing number of endpoints, including mobile devices, laptops, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, has made it easier for cybercriminals to gain access to an organization’s network. As a result, there is an increased likelihood of security incidents occurring.

Increased complexity of IT systems: The complexity of IT systems, including cloud infrastructure and virtualized environments, has made it more challenging for organizations to identify and respond to security incidents.

Improved incident detection: Advances in technology, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, have improved the detection of security incidents. This means that organizations are now able to identify incidents that may have gone unnoticed in the past.

Overall, these factors have contributed to a significant increase in the number of incident alerts that organizations receive, making it more challenging for security teams to manage and respond to incidents effectively.

An MSSP (Managed Security Service Provider) can benefit from using Ridgeback in several ways:

Enhanced threat detection and response capabilities: Ridgeback provides a unique approach to threat detection and response by automatically engaging the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks (with no false positives). This approach provides MSSPs with an additional layer of defense against cyber threats that can be difficult to detect using traditional security solutions.

Improved efficiency: Ridgeback’s automated approach to threat detection and response can help MSSPs improve their efficiency by reducing the time and resources required to manually detect and respond to cyber threats. This can help MSSPs provide more comprehensive and timely security services to their clients.

Additional capabilities: In addition to threat detection and response, Ridgeback provides a range of additional capabilities that can help MSSPs better manage their clients’ security, including vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement.

Competitive advantage: By incorporating Ridgeback into their security offerings, MSSPs can differentiate themselves from competitors and provide a more comprehensive and effective security solution to their clients.

Revenue generation: By offering Ridgeback as part of their security services, MSSPs can generate additional revenue streams and increase the value of their services to clients.

In summary, Ridgeback can provide MSSPs with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities, improved efficiency, additional capabilities, a competitive advantage, and revenue generation opportunities.

Ridgeback can help a hospital with cybersecurity in several ways:

Automatic detection and response: Ridgeback is designed to automatically engage the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks (with no false positives). This means that Ridgeback can quickly detect and respond to cyber threats, minimizing the risk of a successful attack.

Enhanced situational awareness: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility into the hospital’s network, giving security teams a better understanding of what is happening on their network. This enhanced situational awareness can help identify vulnerabilities and potential security threats.

Vulnerability assessment: Ridgeback provides a vulnerability assessment capability, which can help identify potential security vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of a successful cyber attack.

Network hygiene monitoring: Ridgeback monitors the network for any irregularities or suspicious activities, such as unauthorized access attempts or abnormal traffic patterns. This helps ensure the network remains secure and compliant with regulatory requirements.

Acceptable use policy enforcement: Ridgeback can enforce acceptable use policies for network users, ensuring that they are complying with security policies and best practices.

Regulatory compliance: Ridgeback can help hospitals comply with regulatory requirements, such as HIPAA and HITECH, by providing real-time monitoring, detection, and response to potential cyber threats.

In summary, Ridgeback can help hospitals improve their cybersecurity posture by providing automatic detection and response, enhanced situational awareness, vulnerability assessment, network hygiene monitoring, acceptable use policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance.

Ridgeback can help secure telecommunications networks in several ways:

Automatic detection and response: Ridgeback is designed to automatically engage the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks (with no false positives). This means that Ridgeback can quickly detect and respond to cyber threats, minimizing the risk of a successful attack on telecommunications networks.

Enhanced situational awareness: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility into the telecommunications network, giving security teams a better understanding of what is happening on the network. This enhanced situational awareness can help identify vulnerabilities and potential security threats.

Vulnerability assessment: Ridgeback provides a vulnerability assessment capability, which can help identify potential security vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of a successful cyber attack.

Network hygiene monitoring: Ridgeback monitors the network for any irregularities or suspicious activities, such as unauthorized access attempts or abnormal traffic patterns. This helps ensure the network remains secure and compliant with regulatory requirements.

Acceptable use policy enforcement: Ridgeback can enforce acceptable use policies for network users, ensuring that they are complying with security policies and best practices.

Compliance with regulatory requirements: Ridgeback can help telecommunications networks comply with regulatory requirements, such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) standards, by providing real-time monitoring, detection, and response to potential cyber threats.

In summary, Ridgeback can help secure telecommunications networks by providing automatic detection and response, enhanced situational awareness, vulnerability assessment, network hygiene monitoring, acceptable use policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance.

Ridgeback can help protect critical infrastructure in several ways:

Automatic detection and response: Ridgeback is designed to automatically engage the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks (with no false positives). This means that Ridgeback can quickly detect and respond to cyber threats, minimizing the risk of a successful attack on critical infrastructure.

Enhanced situational awareness: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility into the critical infrastructure network, giving security teams a better understanding of what is happening on the network. This enhanced situational awareness can help identify vulnerabilities and potential security threats.

Vulnerability assessment: Ridgeback provides a vulnerability assessment capability, which can help identify potential security vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of a successful cyber attack.

Network hygiene monitoring: Ridgeback monitors the network for any irregularities or suspicious activities, such as unauthorized access attempts or abnormal traffic patterns. This helps ensure the network remains secure and compliant with regulatory requirements.

Acceptable use policy enforcement: Ridgeback can enforce acceptable use policies for network users, ensuring that they are complying with security policies and best practices.

Compliance with regulatory requirements: Ridgeback can help critical infrastructure networks comply with regulatory requirements, such as those set by the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), by providing real-time monitoring, detection, and response to potential cyber threats.

In summary, Ridgeback can help protect critical infrastructure by providing automatic detection and response, enhanced situational awareness, vulnerability assessment, network hygiene monitoring, acceptable use policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. By leveraging these capabilities, organizations can more effectively detect and respond to cyber threats, minimizing the risk of a successful attack on their critical infrastructure.

Ridgeback can help improve bank branch security in several ways:

Automatic detection and response: Ridgeback can automatically detect and respond to cyber threats inside the bank branch network, minimizing the risk of a successful attack. It can deterministically detect, disrupt, and deter attacks with no false positives.

Enhanced situational awareness: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility into the bank branch network, giving security teams a better understanding of what is happening on the network. This enhanced situational awareness can help identify vulnerabilities and potential security threats.

Vulnerability assessment: Ridgeback provides a vulnerability assessment capability, which can help identify potential security vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of a successful cyber attack.

Network hygiene monitoring: Ridgeback monitors the bank branch network for any irregularities or suspicious activities, such as unauthorized access attempts or abnormal traffic patterns. This helps ensure the network remains secure and compliant with regulatory requirements.

Acceptable use policy enforcement: Ridgeback can enforce acceptable use policies for bank branch network users, ensuring that they are complying with security policies and best practices.

Compliance with regulatory requirements: Ridgeback can help bank branch networks comply with regulatory requirements, such as those set by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), by providing real-time monitoring, detection, and response to potential cyber threats.

In summary, Ridgeback can help improve bank branch security by providing automatic detection and response, enhanced situational awareness, vulnerability assessment, network hygiene monitoring, acceptable use policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. By leveraging these capabilities, organizations can more effectively detect and respond to cyber threats, minimizing the risk of a successful attack on their bank branch networks.

Public utilities, such as power plants, water treatment facilities, and transportation systems, face unique cybersecurity challenges and threats. Some of the top cybersecurity concerns of public utilities include:

Cyber attacks on critical infrastructure: Public utilities are a prime target for cyber attacks aimed at disrupting essential services, causing physical damage, and compromising sensitive information.

Physical security: Many public utilities have physical infrastructure that is vulnerable to attacks, such as power lines, water towers, and pipelines. Ensuring the physical security of these assets is critical to protecting public safety and maintaining service availability.

Insider threats: Public utilities may face threats from employees or contractors who have access to critical systems and data. Insider threats can range from unintentional errors to malicious activity aimed at disrupting services or stealing data.

Third-party risks: Public utilities often rely on third-party vendors and partners for critical services, such as software and hardware maintenance, and may be vulnerable to attacks targeting these vendors.

Regulatory compliance: Public utilities are subject to a range of regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity, including NERC CIP and the EU Network and Information Systems (NIS) Directive. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant financial penalties and reputational damage.

Lack of resources: Public utilities may have limited budgets and staff for cybersecurity, which can make it difficult to implement robust security measures and respond to security incidents effectively.

Overall, public utilities face a range of cybersecurity challenges that require a comprehensive approach to security, including threat detection and response, vulnerability management, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Hospitals and other healthcare organizations face a wide range of cybersecurity concerns due to the sensitive nature of the data they store and the critical services they provide. Some of the top cybersecurity concerns for hospitals include:

Ransomware attacks: Ransomware attacks have become increasingly common in the healthcare industry, and hospitals are a prime target due to the critical nature of their services. These attacks can result in significant financial losses and disrupt patient care.

Data breaches: Healthcare organizations store a large amount of sensitive patient data, including personal and medical information. Data breaches can result in the loss or theft of this data, which can lead to identity theft, fraud, and reputational damage.

Insider threats: Hospitals may face threats from employees or contractors who have access to sensitive data or systems. Insider threats can range from unintentional errors to malicious activity aimed at stealing data or disrupting services.

Medical device vulnerabilities: Many medical devices used in hospitals have known vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to gain access to hospital networks or disrupt patient care.

Phishing attacks: Phishing attacks are a common method used by attackers to gain access to hospital networks or steal sensitive data. These attacks often rely on social engineering tactics to trick users into providing login credentials or downloading malware.

Compliance with regulations: Hospitals are subject to a range of regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity, including HIPAA and GDPR. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant financial penalties and reputational damage.

Overall, hospitals face a range of cybersecurity challenges that require a comprehensive approach to security, including threat detection and response, vulnerability management, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

.

Manufacturing organizations face a range of cybersecurity concerns, including protecting sensitive intellectual property, ensuring secure access to production systems, and protecting against supply chain attacks. Ridgeback can help address these concerns in a number of ways:

Automated threat detection and response: Ridgeback’s automated threat detection and response capabilities can help manufacturing organizations detect and respond to cyber threats in real-time, minimizing the impact of attacks and reducing the risk of data loss or production downtime.

Network segmentation: Ridgeback’s micro-segmentation capabilities can help manufacturing organizations segment their networks and protect sensitive production systems from unauthorized access.

Supply chain security: Ridgeback can help manufacturing organizations monitor their supply chains for potential cyber threats and ensure that suppliers and partners are meeting security requirements.

Incident response: Ridgeback provides a centralized platform for incident response, allowing manufacturing organizations to quickly respond to and contain cyber incidents.

Compliance: Ridgeback can help manufacturing organizations comply with a range of cybersecurity regulations, including NIST, CMMC, and GDPR.

Overall, Ridgeback provides a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for manufacturing organizations, addressing a range of threats and helping to protect critical production systems and intellectual property.

Introduction

Cyber attacks are increasingly becoming a common occurrence in today’s world. From small businesses to large enterprises, no one is immune to the effects of these attacks. A cyber attack can be catastrophic to any organization, leading to financial loss, reputational damage, and even the loss of sensitive data. As a result, organizations are investing heavily in cybersecurity solutions to protect their assets from cyber threats. Ridgeback is one such cybersecurity solution that offers a unique approach to deterring cyber attacks. This white paper will explore how Ridgeback can be used as a deterrent to cyber attacks.

What is Ridgeback?

Ridgeback is an innovative cybersecurity solution that automatically engages the adversary inside the network during hacking operations. It deterministically detects, disrupts, and deters attacks with no false positives. Ridgeback’s operating methods also deliver additional capabilities for security and IT management, including vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement. Ridgeback is dual-use and can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud.

Ridgeback as a Deterrent to Cyber Attacks

Cybersecurity solutions are usually categorized into two broad categories: preventative and detective. Preventative solutions aim to stop a cyber attack before it happens, while detective solutions aim to detect and respond to an attack in progress. Ridgeback takes a unique approach to cybersecurity by being a deterrent to cyber attacks. It does this by engaging the adversary inside the network, disrupting their operations, and making it nearly impossible for them to achieve their objectives.

One of the ways Ridgeback deters cyber attacks is by making it unattractive for attackers to target an organization. Ridgeback can detect and disrupt attacks in real-time, which means that attackers are impaired as they attempt to achieve their objectives. Knowing that their operations will be disrupted discourages attackers from targeting an organization.

Ridgeback’s ability to detect and disrupt attacks in real-time also means that attackers will be unable to establish a foothold in an organization’s network. This is important because once an attacker has a foothold, they can move laterally, compromising more systems and stealing more data. Ridgeback can help prevent this by detecting and disrupting an attack before the attacker can establish a foothold.

Another way Ridgeback deters cyber attacks is by making it difficult for attackers to achieve their objectives. Ridgeback can isolate compromised systems, preventing attackers from moving laterally or exfiltrating data. Ridgeback can also slow down the attackers’ operations, making it more difficult for them to achieve their objectives. This can be frustrating for attackers, who may choose to target an easier target.

Finally, Ridgeback’s capabilities can help organizations demonstrate their cybersecurity posture to regulators, auditors, and customers. This can be an important factor in deterring cyber attacks, as organizations with a strong cybersecurity posture are less likely to be targeted.

Conclusion

Cyber attacks are a growing concern for organizations of all sizes. As such, it is essential to invest in cybersecurity solutions that can effectively protect against these threats. Ridgeback offers a unique approach to cybersecurity by being a deterrent to cyber attacks. By engaging the adversary inside the network, disrupting their operations, and making it difficult for them to achieve their objectives, Ridgeback can help organizations deter cyber attacks.

Comprehensive asset discovery: Ridgeback’s network sensor can quickly and accurately discover all endpoints, even those that are not visible to traditional network scanning tools, providing auditors with a complete picture of the network’s assets.

Real-time monitoring: Ridgeback’s continuous monitoring capability can help auditors detect and respond to threats in real-time, improving the accuracy and effectiveness of the audit.

Rapid incident response: Ridgeback’s automated response and containment features can help auditors quickly remediate any security incidents discovered during the audit, reducing the impact and duration of any potential breaches.

Compliance reporting: Ridgeback’s compliance reporting capabilities can help auditors assess the organization’s compliance with regulatory frameworks such as HIPAA, PCI, and GDPR, providing a valuable tool for compliance audits.

Risk assessment: Ridgeback’s risk assessment capabilities can help auditors identify potential vulnerabilities and risks within the network, allowing them to develop recommendations for improving the organization’s security posture.

Baseline security monitoring: Ridgeback can provide auditors with a baseline understanding of the organization’s security posture, helping to identify potential areas of weakness or improvement.

Overall, Ridgeback’s rapid assessment capabilities can help cyber risk auditors improve the accuracy and efficiency of their audits, leading to better risk management and improved security outcomes.

Ridgeback can be uniquely helpful to VAPT (Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing) services providers in several ways

Provides a powerful and flexible tool for identifying vulnerabilities and risks in customer networks quickly and accurately.

Allows for easy integration with existing VAPT workflows and tools, reducing the amount of time and effort required to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Enables VAPT providers to offer more comprehensive and effective penetration testing services, with the ability to detect and respond to real-world cyberattacks in real-time.

Enables VAPT providers to deliver more accurate and detailed reports to their customers, with a focus on identifying and remediating critical vulnerabilities that pose the greatest risk to the customer’s network.

Helps VAPT providers demonstrate the value of their services to customers by providing tangible evidence of the risks and vulnerabilities that exist within their network.

Ridgeback’s deployment architecture is different from signal classification solutions. Signal classification solutions typically require the deployment of sensors and agents on all endpoints and servers within an organization’s network. These sensors and agents then collect data that is analyzed by the platform to detect and respond to threats.

In contrast, Ridgeback’s deployment architecture only requires a single 1MB file to be installed on one device in each network segment, and it can be deployed globally in minutes. This approach makes Ridgeback highly unique and efficient, as it does not require extensive installation or configuration processes, and it can be easily scaled to large and complex networks.

Furthermore, Ridgeback’s unique deployment architecture also allows for easy and cost-effective deployment of the solution in situations where traditional endpoint protection or network security solutions may not be feasible, such as in remote or highly distributed environments.

Overall, while both Ridgeback and signal classification solutions aim to provide cybersecurity solutions, their deployment architectures are fundamentally different, with Ridgeback’s approach being highly unique and efficient.

Ridgeback:

Actively engages with malicious intruders in the network to impose costs on them during their exploit, deterring attacks in addition to detecting and responding to them.

Requires only a single 1MB file to be installed on one device in each network segment for deployment, making it highly efficient and quick to deploy.

Provides a form of situational awareness, delivering insights into network hygiene and vulnerability that no other product offers.

Enforces acceptable-use policies, delivering capabilities such as network access control and micro-segmentation.

Designed as an Attack Disruption & Deterrence solution.

Signal classification solutions:

Rely on the collection and analysis of data from endpoints or network traffic to identify patterns and anomalies that may indicate malicious activity.

Use advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms to detect and respond to threats in real-time.

Require the deployment of sensors and agents on all endpoints and servers within an organization’s network.

Typically classified as Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) or Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions.

Designed primarily as detection and response solutions.

Ridgeback

Pros

• Actively engages with malicious intruders in the network, deterring attacks in addition to detecting and responding to them.
• Requires only a single 1MB file to be installed on one device in each network segment for deployment, making it highly efficient and quick to deploy.
• Provides a form of situational awareness, delivering insights into network hygiene and vulnerability that no other product offers.
• Enforces acceptable-use policies, delivering capabilities such as network access control and micro-segmentation.
• Can be deployed globally in minutes and starts working immediately.
• Provides unique insights into network hygiene and vulnerability that can be useful in M&A acquisition due diligence, VAPTs, risk management firms and auditors, cyber insurance underwriting, forensics and MSSPs, for example.

Signal classification solutions

Pros

• Use advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms to detect and respond to threats in real-time.
• Can be highly effective in identifying known and unknown threats.
• Provide granular visibility into endpoint and network activity.
• Can be integrated with other security tools to provide a comprehensive cybersecurity solution.

Ridgeback 

Cons

• Ridgeback is a relatively new product with less market recognition than established cybersecurity solutions.
• Ridgeback’s proactive approach to cybersecurity may be unfamiliar to some organizations.

Signal classification solutions

Cons

• Can be complex and time-consuming to deploy, requiring sensors and agents to be installed on all endpoints and servers.
• May generate a high volume of alerts, making it challenging to identify real threats.
• May require significant manual effort to investigate and respond to threats.
• May miss threats that do not fit pre-defined patterns or that use novel attack techniques.

Overall, Ridgeback’s active engagement of malicious intruders, efficient deployment, and unique insights into network hygiene and vulnerability provide significant advantages over traditional signal classification solutions. However, signal classification solutions can still be highly effective in detecting and responding to known and unknown threats and provide granular visibility into endpoint and network activity. Ultimately, the choice between Ridgeback and signal classification solutions will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the organization.

Ridgeback and User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are both cybersecurity solutions designed to enhance network defense. However, there are some differences between these two approaches:

Approach: Ridgeback is a network defense solution that automatically engages the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks. UEBA solutions, on the other hand, focus on analyzing user and entity behavior to detect anomalous activity that may indicate a security threat.

Scope: Ridgeback has a broader range of capabilities beyond just behavior analytics, including vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement. UEBA solutions primarily focus on behavior analytics.

Implementation: Ridgeback is an endpoint agent that can be deployed on individual machines, while UEBA solutions are typically implemented at the network level to analyze user and entity behavior across multiple systems.

Detection and response: Ridgeback is designed to automatically detect and respond to attacks within the network, while UEBA solutions typically focus on detecting anomalous behavior and generating alerts for further investigation by security analysts.

In summary, while both Ridgeback and UEBA solutions are designed to enhance network defense, they differ in their approach, scope, implementation, detection and response capabilities, and cost. Organizations may choose to adopt one or both solutions, depending on their specific cybersecurity needs and objectives.

AMTD is a category of cybersecurity solutions that uses dynamic and automated techniques to change the attack surface of systems, making it more difficult for attackers to identify and exploit vulnerabilities. Ridgeback, on the other hand, is a network defense solution that automatically engages the adversary inside the network during hacking operations, deterministically detecting, disrupting, and deterring attacks.

Here are some specific differences between Ridgeback and the AMTD category:

Approach: Ridgeback primarily focuses on detecting and responding to attacks within the network, while AMTD solutions focus on preventing successful attacks by changing system configurations.

Scope: Ridgeback has a wider range of capabilities beyond just moving target defense, including vulnerability assessment, situational awareness, network hygiene monitoring, and acceptable-use policy enforcement. AMTD solutions primarily focus on moving target defense.

Detection and response: Ridgeback is designed to automatically detect and respond to attacks within the network, while AMTD solutions do not necessarily include detection and response capabilities.

In summary, while both Ridgeback and AMTD solutions are designed to enhance network defense, they differ in their approach, implementation, scope, detection and response capabilities. Organizations may choose to adopt one or both solutions, depending on their specific cybersecurity needs and objectives.

Ridgeback can be a useful tool for organizations to comply with various cybersecurity regulations and frameworks, such as the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA, among others. Here’s how Ridgeback’s capabilities can help with compliance:

Real-time network situational awareness: Ridgeback provides real-time visibility into the network, including details about IPs, MACs, ports, services, and patterns of communication. This information can help organizations meet the network visibility requirements of various regulations.

Network hygiene: Ridgeback identifies and exposes key issues in network hygiene that are productivity concerns and security vulnerabilities. This information can help organizations meet the security hygiene requirements of various regulations.

Attack disruption and deterrence: Ridgeback can disrupt and deter attacks automatically and at scale, which can help organizations meet the incident response requirements of various regulations.

Micro-segmentation: Ridgeback’s policy engine allows for micro-segmentation, which can help organizations meet the segmentation requirements of various regulations.

System monitoring: Ridgeback provides system monitoring capabilities that can help organizations meet the monitoring requirements of various regulations.

Endpoint visibility: Ridgeback provides endpoint visibility capabilities that can help organizations meet the endpoint security requirements of various regulations.

By providing comprehensive awareness of communication and exposing key issues in network hygiene, Ridgeback can help organizations improve their cyber-defense posture and meet the compliance requirements of various cybersecurity regulations and frameworks.

Gartner’s cybersecurity categories that cover cybersecurity compliance obligations include:

Integrated Risk Management (IRM)

Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)

Security and Risk Management Services (SRMS)

These categories provide solutions for managing compliance obligations, including regulatory requirements, industry standards, and internal policies. They offer tools for policy management, risk assessments, compliance reporting, and audit management, among others.

Probabilistic cybersecurity solutions rely on statistical models to detect and predict cyber attacks. While these solutions can be effective in some cases, they have some potential flaws, including:

False positives: Probabilistic models may generate false alarms or false positives, indicating that an attack is happening when in reality it is not. These false positives can be costly and time-consuming to investigate, and may distract security teams from real threats.

Limited scope: Probabilistic models are only as good as the data they are trained on, and may be limited in their ability to detect new or unknown threats. They may also be less effective in detecting sophisticated attacks that use advanced evasion techniques or mimic legitimate traffic.

Vulnerability to attacks: Probabilistic models are vulnerable to attacks that manipulate or evade detection by exploiting weaknesses in the model or the underlying data. Attackers may be able to bypass the model and go undetected by exploiting blind spots or vulnerabilities.

Complexity: Probabilistic models can be complex and difficult to understand, which may make it difficult for security teams to interpret the results and take appropriate actions. This can also make it harder to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the model.

Cost: Developing and maintaining probabilistic models can be expensive, particularly for smaller organizations or those with limited resources. This can limit the availability and accessibility of these solutions.How are classification solutions vulnerable to adversaries deploying AI to design their exploits?

Cybersecurity classification solutions like Crowdstrike and Rapid7 rely on a combination of signature-based and behavioral-based detection techniques to identify and block potential threats. These solutions typically use machine learning algorithms to analyze large volumes of data and identify patterns of behavior that may indicate an attack.

However, these solutions can be vulnerable to adversaries deploying exploits using artificial intelligence (AI) for several reasons:

Adversaries can use AI to create sophisticated and targeted attacks that can evade traditional signature-based detection techniques. These attacks can be designed to mimic legitimate traffic and avoid detection by security solutions.

Adversaries can use AI to learn from previous attacks and adapt their techniques to bypass the behavioral-based detection techniques used by cybersecurity solutions.

Adversaries can use AI to automate their attacks and carry out more complex and coordinated attacks at a faster rate. This can overwhelm security solutions and make it more difficult for them to keep up with the evolving threat landscape.

Adversaries can use AI to generate false positives or overload security solutions with meaningless data, which can lead to alert fatigue and reduce the effectiveness of the security solution.

To address these vulnerabilities, cybersecurity solutions need to incorporate AI and machine learning techniques in their own detection and response capabilities. This can help to improve the speed and accuracy of threat detection and response, and better defend against AI-powered attacks. Additionally, cybersecurity solutions need to be regularly updated and adapted to stay ahead of the evolving threat landscape.